Following the No Message. 689 posted by INPS in date 20 February 2019 with object having:

Performance to support income, welfare and social security, subjects related to missing and homeless. Operating instructions for application management

the fio.PSD sent to the Director General din INPS a request for clarification as to a possible analogy interpretative Many homeless people could lose their enjoyment of welfare benefits , Current and future

To the c.a. General Manager,

with reference to your message n. 689 of 20/02/2019, sent to local authorities, we would like to represent them as follows:

To the point 2 the said note, namely Paragraph concerning benefits in support of supporting social income, It is established as a subjective requirement for repayment of the
the performance “actual residence” the beneficiary and, following, is assimilated status “homeless person” to that of “not to be found” .

We wonder and we ask, what are the legal regulations and the interpretation to be given to “actual residence” and what is the position of people homeless that to date are recorded at the municipal registry offices with “fictitious residence”. These people are not unobtainable but for a possible analogy of interpretation arising from the circular could lose the enjoyment of welfare benefits , Current and future.

Certain of his sensitivity to the issue of severe marginalization, We are hoping for a prompt clarification, so as to facilitate the peaceful development of the programmed operation, both national, both territorial against homelessness. We reiterate our willingness to jointly go into that.

Cristina Aboagye, president fio.PSD